Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Programmable viscosity metamaterials: Designing fluid properties using temporal superposition of shear and acoustics

Prateek Sehgal1,*, Meera Ramaswamy2, Edward Y. X. Ong2, Christopher Ness3, Itai Cohen2, and Brian J. Kirby1,4

  • 1Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
  • 3School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FG, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill–Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA

  • *Contact author: ps824@cornell.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 6, 043107 – Published 5 November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043107

Abstract

Metamaterials are composite structures whose extraordinary properties arise from a mesoscale organization of their constituents. Here, we introduce a different material class—viscosity metafluids. Specifically, we demonstrate that we can rapidly drive large viscosity oscillations in shear-thickened fluids using acoustic perturbations with kHz to MHz frequencies. Because the timescale for these oscillations can be orders of magnitude smaller than the timescales associated with the global material flow, we can construct metafluids whose resulting time-averaged viscosity is a composite of the thickened, high-viscosity and dethickened, low-viscosity states. We show that viscosity metafluids can be used to engineer a variety of unique properties including zero, infinite, and negative viscosities. The high degree of control over the resulting viscosity, the ease with which they can be accessed, and the variety of exotic properties achievable make viscosity metafluids attractive for uses in technologies ranging from coatings to cloaking to 3D printing.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (57)

  1. L. R. Meza, A. J. Zelhofer, N. Clarke, A. J. Mateos, D. M. Kochmann, and J. R. Greer, Resilient 3D hierarchical architected metamaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11502 (2015).
  2. V. M. Shalaev, W. Cai, U. K. Chettiar, H.-K. Yuan, A. K. Sarychev, V. P. Drachev, and A. V. Kildishev, Negative index of refraction in optical metamaterials, Opt. Lett. 30, 3356 (2005).
  3. T. Han, X. Bai, J. T. L. Thong, B. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, Full control and manipulation of heat signatures: Cloaking, camouflage and thermal metamaterials, Adv. Mater. 26, 1731 (2014).
  4. N. I. Landy, S. Sajuyigbe, J. J. Mock, D. R. Smith, and W. J. Padilla, Perfect metamaterial absorber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 207402 (2008).
  5. T. Brunet, A. Merlin, B. Mascaro, K. Zimny, J. Leng, O. Poncelet, C. Aristégui, and O. Mondain-Monval, Soft 3D acoustic metamaterial with negative index, Nat. Mater. 14, 384 (2015).
  6. J. Park, J. R. Youn, and Y. S. Song, Hydrodynamic metamaterial cloak for drag-free flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 074502 (2019).
  7. J. Park, J. R. Youn, and Y. S. Song, Fluid-flow rotator based on hydrodynamic metamaterial, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 061002(R) (2019).
  8. J. Park, J. R. Youn, and Y. S. Song, Metamaterial hydrodynamic flow concentrator, Extreme Mech. Lett. 42, 101061 (2021).
  9. S. A. Cummer, J. Christensen, and A. Alù, Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16001 (2016).
  10. O. Peretz, E. Ben Abu, A. Zigelman, S. Givli, and A. D. Gat, A metafluid with multistable density and internal energy states, Nat. Commun. 13, 1810 (2022).
  11. A. Djellouli, B. Van Raemdonck, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, A. Caillaud, D. Weitz, S. Rubinstein, B. Gorissen, and K. Bertoldi, Shell buckling for programmable metafluids, Nature (London) 628, 545 (2024).
  12. Y. A. Urzhumov, G. Shvets, J. Fan, F. Capasso, D. Brandl, and P. Nordlander, Plasmonic nanoclusters: A path towards negative-index metafluids, Opt. Express 15, 14129 (2007).
  13. P. Sehgal, M. Ramaswamy, I. Cohen, and B. J. Kirby, Using acoustic perturbations to dynamically tune shear thickening in colloidal suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 128001 (2019).
  14. M. M. Denn, J. F. Morris, and D. Bonn, Shear thickening in concentrated suspensions of smooth spheres in newtonian suspending fluids, Soft Matter 14, 170 (2018).
  15. N. J. Wagner and J. F. Brady, Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions, Phys. Today 62(10), 27 (2009).
  16. E. Brown and H. M. Jaeger, Shear thickening in concentrated suspensions: Phenomenology, mechanisms and relations to jamming, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 046602 (2014).
  17. H. A. Barnes, Shear-thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in newtonian liquids, J. Rheol. 33, 329 (1989).
  18. N. Y. C. Lin, C. Ness, M. E. Cates, J. Sun, and I. Cohen, Tunable shear thickening in suspensions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10774 (2016).
  19. R. Mari, R. Seto, J. F. Morris, and M. M. Denn, Shear thickening, frictionless and frictional rheologies in non-Brownian suspensions, J. Rheol. 58, 1693 (2014).
  20. M. E. Cates, J. P. Wittmer, J.-P. Bouchaud, and P. Claudin, Jamming, force chains, and fragile matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1841 (1998).
  21. T. S. Majmudar and R. P. Behringer, Contact force measurements and stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials, Nature (London) 435, 1079 (2005).
  22. M. M. Denn and J. F. Morris, Rheology of non-Brownian suspensions, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 5, 203 (2014).
  23. E. Brown and H. M. Jaeger, The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions, J. Rheol. 56, 875 (2012).
  24. M. Wyart and M. E. Cates, Discontinuous shear thickening without inertia in dense non-Brownian suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 098302 (2014).
  25. N. Fernandez, R. Mani, D. Rinaldi, D. Kadau, M. Mosquet, H. Lombois-Burger, J. Cayer-Barrioz, H. J. Herrmann, N. D. Spencer, and L. Isa, Microscopic mechanism for shear thickening of non-Brownian suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 108301 (2013).
  26. J. R. Royer, D. L. Blair, and S. D. Hudson, Rheological signature of frictional interactions in shear thickening suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 188301 (2016).
  27. A. Singh, C. Ness, R. Seto, J. J. de Pablo, and H. M. Jaeger, Shear thickening and jamming of dense suspensions: The “roll” of friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 248005 (2020).
  28. N. Y. C. Lin, B. M. Guy, M. Hermes, C. Ness, J. Sun, W. C. K. Poon, and I. Cohen, Hydrodynamic and contact contributions to continuous shear thickening in colloidal suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 228304 (2015).
  29. D. Bi, J. Zhang, B. Chakraborty, and R. P. Behringer, Jamming by shear, Nature (London) 480, 355 (2011).
  30. J. F. Morris, Lubricated-to-frictional shear thickening scenario in dense suspensions, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 110508 (2018).
  31. R. Seto, R. Mari, J. F. Morris, and M. M. Denn, Discontinuous shear thickening of frictional hard-sphere suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 218301 (2013).
  32. C. Ness, R. Mari, and M. E. Cates, Shaken and stirred: Random organization reduces viscosity and dissipation in granular suspensions, Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3296 (2018).
  33. S. Pradeep, M. Nabizadeh, A. R. Jacob, S. Jamali, and L. C. Hsiao, Jamming distance dictates colloidal shear thickening, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 158002 (2021).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043107 for discussion on measurement of structure factor in simulations, latency in fully dethickened states, and generating effective viscosities with applied strain rate.
  35. C. Ness and M. E. Cates, Absorbing-state transitions in granular materials close to jamming, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 088004 (2020).
  36. D. Hexner and D. Levine, Hyperuniformity of critical absorbing states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 110602 (2015).
  37. S. Wilken, R. E. Guerra, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Hyperuniform structures formed by shearing colloidal suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 148001 (2020).
  38. S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Local density fluctuations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041113 (2003).
  39. C. E. Zachary and S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity in point patterns and two-phase random heterogeneous media, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2009) P12015.
  40. R. Dreyfus, Y. Xu, T. Still, L. A. Hough, A. G. Yodh, and S. Torquato, Diagnosing hyperuniformity in two-dimensional, disordered, jammed packings of soft spheres, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012302 (2015).
  41. S. Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys. Rep. 745, 1 (2018).
  42. Although at low Re, the fluid physics has no inherent timescale, there exist strain scales in the system corresponding to force chain formation or breakup. We refer informally to the timescale of the system as the ratio of the strain scale to the strain rate. This enables comparisons between the temporal manifestation of the strain scale and the time durations applied via acoustics.
  43. E. Y. X. Ong, M. Ramaswamy, R. Niu, N. Y. C. Lin, A. Shetty, R. N. Zia, G. H. McKinley, and I. Cohen, Stress decomposition in LAOS of dense colloidal suspensions, J. Rheol. 64, 343 (2020).
  44. K. R. Lennon, M. Geri, G. H. McKinley, and J. W. Swan, Medium amplitude parallel superposition (MAPS) rheology. Part 2: Experimental protocols and data analysis, J. Rheol. 64, 1263 (2020).
  45. K. Hyun, M. Wilhelm, C. O. Klein, K. S. Cho, J. G. Nam, K. H. Ahn, S. J. Lee, R. H. Ewoldt, and G. H. McKinley, A review of nonlinear oscillatory shear tests: Analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS), Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 1697 (2011).
  46. J. Ahmed, Advances in rheological measurements of food products, Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 23, 127 (2018).
  47. Y. Z. Dong, Y. Seo, and H. J. Choi, Recent development of electro-responsive smart electrorheological fluids, Soft Matter 15, 3473 (2019).
  48. J. R. Morillas and J. de Vicente, Magnetorheology: A review, Soft Matter 16, 9614 (2020).
  49. M. Eshaghi, R. Sedaghati, and S. Rakheja, Dynamic characteristics and control of magnetorheological/electrorheological sandwich structures: A state-of-the-art review, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 27, 2003 (2016).
  50. Y. A. Urzhumov and D. R. Smith, Fluid flow control with transformation media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 074501 (2011).
  51. D. Culver and Y. Urzhumov, Forced underwater laminar flows with active magnetohydrodynamic metamaterials, Phys. Rev. E 96, 063107 (2017).
  52. J. Park and Y. S. Song, Assembling hydrodynamic cloaks to conceal complex objects from drag, J. Fluids Struct. 98, 103136 (2020).
  53. H. Pang, Y. You, A. Feng, and K. Chen, Hydrodynamic manipulation cloak for redirecting fluid flow, Phys. Fluids 34, 053603 (2022).
  54. B. Wang, T.-M. Shih, L. Xu, G. Dai, and J. Huang, Intangible hydrodynamic cloaks for convective flows, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034014 (2021).
  55. E. Boyko, V. Bacheva, M. Eigenbrod, F. Paratore, A. D. Gat, S. Hardt, and M. Bercovici, Microscale hydrodynamic cloaking and shielding via electro-osmosis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 184502 (2021).
  56. R. E. O'Neill, J. R. Royer, and W. C. K. Poon, Liquid migration in shear thickening suspensions flowing through constrictions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 128002 (2019).
  57. O. Cheal and C. Ness, Rheology of dense granular suspensions under extensional flow, J. Rheol. 62, 501 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation